After I hung up with Brad from Summit Tree, I went inside and pulled out the easement agreement. Filed away with my father’s other documents, organized in the way that someone from his generation organized important things—carefully labeled, in a manila folder, in a box clearly marked “Property Documents.”
I read through it carefully, my anger building with each paragraph. Found the clause my father had insisted on, the one that gave him—and now gave me—a particular kind of power that most people wouldn’t recognize until the moment they needed it.
“The grantor reserves the right to revoke this easement upon thirty days’ written notice if the grantee or its members cause material damage to the grantor’s property or interfere with the grantor’s quiet enjoyment of the land.”
Six mature sycamores, cut down without permission, without notification, without even the basic courtesy of asking if they were actually on the property they claimed.
That seemed like material damage.
That seemed like interference with quiet enjoyment.
I called my lawyer. Patricia Chen had handled my father’s estate, understood the history of the property, and had always struck me as someone who understood that some agreements exist precisely to be enforced when necessary.
“Patricia, I need to talk to you about something. Cedar Ridge Estates cut down six trees on my property this morning.”
“They what? They cut down your trees?”
“Without permission. Without asking. They claim it was a surveying error, but I have the easement agreement right here, and I’m looking at the revocation clause.”
Patricia was quiet for a moment. Then: “Do you have the easement agreement handy?”
“Right in front of me.”
“Read me the revocation clause.”
I did.
She whistled softly. “Eli, that’s… that’s a nuclear option. If you revoke that easement, Cedar Ridge has no road access. They’d be landlocked.”
“I know.”
“And you’re sure you want to do this? Because once you start down this road, there’s no going back. The legal fight will be significant. The HOA will probably sue. This could take years.”
I looked out the window at the stumps. At the exposed hillside where my father’s trees used to stand. At the shade that would no longer exist, the privacy that had been stripped away, the message that had been sent: “Your land is ours to manage as we see fit.”
“I’m sure,” I said. “They made a decision about my property without asking me. Now I’m making a decision about theirs.”
The Letter That Started Everything
Patricia drafted the notice. Formal. Legal. Citing the damage, the violation, the clause that gave me the right to enforce consequences.
“This letter serves as formal notice of revocation of the easement granted to Cedar Ridge Estates HOA on March 15, 2019. Per Section 7(b) of the agreement, this revocation takes effect thirty days from the date of this notice due to material damage caused to the grantor’s property by actions authorized by the grantee.”
I hand-delivered it to the HOA president’s mailbox that evening. A man named Gordon Hale. Mid-fifties. Real estate developer. The kind of guy who wears polo shirts with his company logo and thinks volume equals authority.
Then I went home and waited.
The response came two days later—certified mail, return receipt requested, from the HOA’s attorney.
“Dear Mr. Morrison, We are in receipt of your notice of easement revocation dated [date]. While we acknowledge an unfortunate miscommunication regarding tree removal, we do not believe this constitutes grounds for revocation under the agreement. The trees in question were believed to be located on HOA property based on survey records. We request an immediate meeting to resolve this matter amicably.”
I called Patricia. “They’re calling it a miscommunication.”
“Of course they are. Did they offer to pay for the trees?”
“No. They want a meeting to ‘resolve it amicably.’”
“Do you want to meet with them?”
I thought about it. About my father planting those trees when I was eight years old. About Gordon Hale signing an authorization to cut them down because they blocked his members’ view of the valley. About the presumption that my land was just a resource for them to manage.
“No. The notice stands. Thirty days.”
Leave a Comment